New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trump’s latest CDC chief pick commits to ‘never betray the science’ at Senate confirmation hearing

The White House nominated Erica Schwartz, a former deputy surgeon general, to head the nation’s top public health agency

Erica Schwartz attends her nomination hearing to become Director Of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Capitol Hill July 15, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Erica Schwartz attends her nomination hearing to become director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Capitol Hill on July 15, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

Photo by Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

President Donald Trump’s latest choice to lead the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention appeared before a Senate committee on Wednesday to answer lawmakers’ questions about her readiness for the role.

Erica Schwartz was previously deputy surgeon general in the first Trump administration—a civil position that isn’t politically appointed—and a rear admiral in the U.S. Coast Guard, where she served as chief medical officer.

“Public health is in my DNA,” Schwartz said at the hearing. Her first priority at the CDC would be to restore trust, she said, adding that “I will never betray the science.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The remarks come as faith in the nation’s highest public health agency has nose-dived. A poll released in June of this year found that just 50 percent of Americans said they trusted the agency’s health recommendations, compared with 77 percent in spring 2025. In the year or so that has passed between the two polls, the Trump administration has sought to remake the nation’s health and science agencies.

That effort has proven particularly tumultuous at the CDC. The first agency director under Trump’s second administration, Susan Monarez, was fired in August 2025 and accused Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., of forcing her out for refusing to rubber-stamp vaccine policies that went against research. Jim O’Neill, an investor, was appointed as an interim director until February 2026, before Jay Bhattacharya, the current head of the National Institutes of Health, took over as acting head of the CDC.

Schwartz will need to work under Kennedy if confirmed. Senator Bill Cassidy, the committee chair, alluded to Monarez’s fraught tenure by asking Schwartz if she would stand up to Kennedy if necessary.

“If I’m confirmed as a CDC director, the nation’s health and well-being will take primacy, and I will never compromise on that,” Schwartz said.

Cassidy pressed her repeatedly on whether she would be able to say no to “junk science,” nodding to vaccine skepticism in the administration. “I will never compromise on the science,” she said, adding that the CDC would focus on “radical transparency” and to “lead with humility.”

Senator Bernie Sanders also honed in on vaccines, asking if she would commit to removing information on the CDC website linking vaccines to autism (a claim scientists say has no basis in evidence). “Senator, we do not know what causes autism,” she said, adding that she accepts that overwhelming scientific evidence shows vaccines do not cause autism. Schwartz said that if confirmed, she would ask Kennedy about the information in question.

This is a developing story and may be updated.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe