New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Alaskan permafrost is thawing. Here’s why that’s so worrying

A Wisconsin-sized region of frozen soil is thawing fast, releasing three trillion more gallons of water per year than it did just four decades ago

trees in a river

Dead and slumping boreal forest Alaska birch trees rest in floodwaters amid thawing permafrost and snowmelt at Creamer’s Field in Fairbanks, Alaska, in 2023.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Thawing permafrost is among climate science’s worst “positive feedback loops”: As the world warms, permafrost—essentially frozen soil—thaws, releasing fresh water and carbon into the environment. That release further fuels climate change, driving more warming. (Thawing permafrost has also raised concerns about unleashing new pathogens on humanity.)

And in Alaska, the loop seems to be speeding up. In a new study, researchers tracked how thawing permafrost in a Wisconsin-sized section of the North Slope region of Alaska has added fresh water and dissolved organic carbon to estuaries off the Alaskan coast between 1980 and 2023.

In more recent years, the region released nearly 12 cubic kilometers (three trillion gallons) per year, more water than it did from 1980 to 1984. That’s enough to fill more than 4.5 million Olympic swimming pools, estimates Michael Rawlins, lead author of the study and an extension associate professor of Earth, geographic and climate sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fresh water is a problem for the ocean—it disrupts sea ice formation, alters the salinity of coastal lagoons and bays, could threaten global ocean circulation and carries carbon that’s later released into the atmosphere.

From the early 1980s to 2023, the amount of carbon that northern Alaska’s rivers release into the ocean every year has risen from about 120 gigagrams to about 170 gigagrams—an increase of about 50,000 metric tons of carbon per year.

“Some of that carbon has been locked up for tens of thousands of years. It’s now thawed, mobilized in the rivers, gets to the ocean, where some of it becomes part of the atmosphere,” Rawlins says, comparing this to fossil fuel extraction. “Outgassing”—the release of methane or carbon dioxide—can happen from rivers directly before it reaches the ocean, too.

The study could help researchers better understand permafrost-fueled carbon emissions across the Arctic, a region that is warming about three times faster than the rest of the planet, scientists estimate.

“As we try to better understand the amount of carbon in the ocean, we need good estimates of the amount coming out of these rivers,” Rawlins says.

The findings were published on Wednesday in the journal Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe