New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See the first x-rays of humans taken in space

Equipping spacecraft with x-ray machines could boost safety for long-duration spaceflights—like a crewed mission to Mars

Three X-rays of a human hand

Radiographs of the hand were acquired (A) preflight by a crewmember, (B) in-flight on day 1 after launch (L+1) by a crewmember, and (C) postflight by a non-crew operator using the same imaging protocol.

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Last year, astronauts in orbit took diagnostic x-rays of their own bodies for the very first time—and now, we get to see the results.

On March 31, 2025, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launched the Fram2 mission, which was the first human spaceflight to enter a polar orbit. The four people on board—cryptocurrency investor Chun Wang, film maker Jannicke Mikkelsen, engineer Rabea Rogge and polar explorer Eric Philips—spent three and a half days orbiting Earth.

During that time, they performed various science experiments, including taking x-rays of themselves. The results were published on Tuesday in Radiology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For four decades astronauts aboard spacecraft such as the International Space Station have had some seriously stocked medicine kits, including an ultrasound machine. But an x-ray machine was never part of that cache. That was partly because x-ray machines were too bulky to go to space, but new portable technology is making them more accessible.

“It’s been a dream for aerospace medicine to have more than one imaging modality for diagnosing illnesses and injuries in space,” said Sheyna Gifford, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor of aerospace medicine at Mayo Clinic, in a statement. “X-rays are fast, easy and diagnostically valuable.”

This matters because while NASA may be gearing up to send humans back to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years, the space agency’s long-term goal is a crewed mission to Mars. And as humans venture farther and for longer into space, they will need more diagnostic tools. Compared with ultrasound, x-ray scans are both easier and quicker to perform and assess with minimal training.

The Fram2 mission showed that x-rays are possible to collect in orbit and in microgravity, a feat some suspected would be difficult given the fact that it is hard to stay perfectly still in that environment. The researchers chose a portable, wireless system for the mission, and three of the crew got four hours of training on how to use it.

Four X-rays of a chest

Representative preflight, in-flight, and postflight chest radiographs. Radiographs of the chest were acquired (A) preflight by a crewmember, (B, C) in-flight on day 3 after launch (L+3) by a crewmember, and (D) postflight by a non-crew operator using the same imaging protocol.

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

During the flight, the crew took images of a hand, forearm, abdomen, pelvis and chest. These were compared with preflight and postflight images of the same areas by radiologists, who found no difference in the overall quality of the x-rays. The researchers concluded the set-up could be used for diagnosis, according to the study.

X-rays could also be useful for looking inside equipment, Gifford pointed out. Indeed, the crew also tried out x-raying a smartwatch.

“A spaceflight-ready radiography system would have profound implications not only for crew health but also for mission-critical nonmedical tasks,” Gifford said. “For sustained human presence in space, X-rays are critical not just for crew members but also for other mission components like electronics and spacesuits. The only way to look inside these objects without taking them apart is to X-ray them.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe