New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

OpenAI Would Like You to Share Your Health Data with Its AI Chatbot

Users will be able to upload their health data to ChatGPT in order to get what OpenAI has described as a more personalized experience

Illustration of AI medical technology concepts

BlackJack3D/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

OpenAI wants your health data. On Wednesday OpenAI, the company behind the wildly popular artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT, announced that some users will be able to feed their health information into the bot, from medical records to test results to health and wellness app data. In return, OpenAI says, users can expect ChatGPT to give them more personalized meal planning, nutrition advice and lab test insights.

In a blog post explaining ChatGPT Health on Wednesday, OpenAI said that more than 230 million people a week ask the company’s AI chatbot health-related questions.

The new feature was designed in collaboration with physicians and is meant to help people “take a more active role in understanding and managing their health and wellness” while “supporting, not replacing, care from clinicians,” according to the company.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But as Scientific American and many other outlets have previously reported, some health experts have urged caution when using ChatGPT for health care reasons—and especially for mental health. The company has faced legal scrutiny in recent years after several people, including at least two teenagers, died by suicide after interacting with ChatGPT. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Other experts are more positive. Peter D. Chang, an associate professor of radiological sciences and computer science at the University of California, Irvine, says the tool represents a “step in the right direction” toward more personalized medical care. But he also cautions that users should approach any AI-generated medical advice with a grain of salt. “Maybe don’t do exactly what it says but use it as a starting point to learn more.”

“Absolutely there’s nothing preventing the model from going off the rails to give you a nonsensical result,” Chang says.

IF YOU NEED HELP

If you or someone you know is struggling or having thoughts of suicide, help is available. Call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or use the online Lifeline Chat.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe