New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA’s Hubble reveals a black hole hiding inside a massive star cluster in the Milky Way

Scientists have long suspected that this star cluster was a hotspot for a certain kind of black hole. But for decades, they had been unable to spot any

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have detected a small black hole hiding inside one of the Milky Way’s massive star clusters, Omega Centauri. Researchers believed the cluster to be teeming with stellar-mass black holes, but until now, they had remained elusive.

Researchers pored over more than 20 years of data from the NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, as well as more recent measurements from the agency’s James Webb Space Telescope. They looked for subtle movements of individual stars within Omega Centauri, which lies approximately 17,700 light-years away from Earth and contains some 10 million stars.

One star in particular stuck out to the researchers. It appeared to be circling an object with a mass much larger than its own—a telltale sign of a black hole.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The black hole, called oMEGACat BH-2, is about 4.46 times the mass of the sun, according to the analysis. While previous research had uncovered an “intermediate-mass” black hole at the center of Omega Centauri, oMEGACat BH-2 is the first of potentially many smaller black holes known as stellar-mass black holes to be found in the star cluster.

Star cluster, zoomed in on stellar companion.

Omega Centauri’s first stellar-mass black hole.

“We’ve long suspected that Omega Centauri contains a large population of stellar-mass black holes, but this is the first time we’ve been able to detect one, giving us confidence that we may be able to detect others,” says Matthew Whitaker, lead author of the study and a research assistant at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

The star orbiting oMEGACat BH-2 takes about 94 years to complete its loop, the longest orbital period of any black hole–star system ever recorded, the researchers write.

“For me, this discovery represents one of the first few drops in what may soon be a steady stream of discoveries using this same method,” Whitaker says.

Whitaker expects that more black hole–star pairs throughout the Milky Way will turn up in future data releases from the European Space Agency’s Gaia Space Observatory. And “an even larger number” could be found with the forthcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which will image the sky “with Hubble-like precision.”

The findings were published on Monday in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe