When is a moon not a moon? That’s the riddle raised by a new study, and the solution appears to be “when it’s a planet.” Or maybe the answer is vice versa.
Such are the strange semantic questions raised by studies of CD-35 2722 B, a brown dwarf with about 30 times the mass of Jupiter that’s orbiting a small star that is some 73 light-years from Earth in the system CD-35 2722. The brown dwarf appears to have its own satellite, much like Earth has the moon, albeit one almost as big as the largest planet in our solar system. While astronomers have discovered thousands of exoplanets, CD-35 2722 may be the first star system found that exhibits this three-tiered “star, brown dwarf, satellite” hierarchy.
Earlier observations of CD-35 2722 B, taken at the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, had shown hints of an exomoon—a type of object that has yet to be definitively found—but the data weren’t conclusive. To settle the matter, Kevin Hoy, a Ph.D. student at the Institute of Astrophysical Studies in Santiago, Chile, turned to the European Southern Observatory’s more powerful Very Large Telescope (VLT) and its CRIRES+ instrument on a mountaintop in the high Chilean desert.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
CRIRES+ is a spectrograph, an instrument that parses a star’s light into a rainbowlike spectrum of colors; fluctuations in that spectrum track a star’s motion in the sky, with the spectrum growing bluer if the star is approaching Earth and redder if it is receding. Astronomers hunt for hidden orbiting companions by the way their gravity can pull a star to and fro, creating subtle stellar wobbles that register as a telltale series of “blueshifts” and “redshifts” in the star’s spectrum.
Across almost two and a half years, ending in February 2026, Hoy and his colleagues used the VLT and CRIRES+ to periodically measure the brown dwarf’s spectrum in search of such wobbles, a technique known as radial velocity analysis. As they described in a new paper published in Nature on Thursday, CD-35 2722 B is indeed wobbling from some otherwise unseen satellite that is circling it once every 170 days.
Exactly what to call this companion is a matter of debate. While it acts like a moon, it’s big—really, really big—with a minimum mass that is 90 percent that of Jupiter. “The mass could be even higher,” Hoy notes, adding that the object’s sheer size likely means it’s mostly made of gas rather than rock, ice or metal. Were it orbiting a full-fledged star rather than a distinctly substellar brown dwarf, astronomers would simply call the object an exoplanet—and a relatively unremarkable one at that.
Brown dwarfs occupy a peculiar place in the cosmic pecking order. They’re gassy orbs that are many times larger than Jupiter yet too small to have hit the critical mass for sustaining the thermonuclear fusion reactions that make stars shine. (This is why brown dwarfs are often referred to as failed stars.) Given how weird they are, it makes sense that bodies that orbit them would be oddities as well.
The closest analogue to Hoy’s finding may be HD 206893 b, a conspicuously wobbling, 28-Jupiter-mass exoplanet that is 129 light-years away from Earth, says David Kipping, an exomoon-hunting astronomer at Columbia University, who did not work on the new study. But while HD 206893 b’s wobble is consistent with the persistent tug from an accompanying satellite of about half Jupiter’s mass, he says, a paper published in January showed this signal could just as well have other explanations, making the wobble evidence for a “candidate” exomoon at best. CD-35 2722 B’s putative exomoon is technically just a candidate, too, but its associated wobble is much clearer and harder to explain away.
“It’s a candidate object, but it probably is real,” Kipping says. “In this case, they feel like it’s more secure, and I would probably buy that. It does look [like] a really clean detection.”
As astronomical instruments continue to improve, it’s likely that more small, strange candidate companions will be found for brown dwarfs and exoplanets alike, Hoy says. That means astronomers will have to start coming up with better definitions for what constitutes an exomoon versus an exoplanet in the first place. For now, he suggests, we could stick with a more neutral term for all these objects: exosatellites.
An already-borderline object such as the brown dwarf CD-35 2722 B is “the perfect place to kick-start this kind of conversation because the system is like the perfect test bed for arguing about things,” Hoy says. “The star is clearly a star. The brown dwarf is also clearly a brown dwarf. Now we have this new object that is too big to obviously be a moon. How we draw the line between what’s a moon and what’s a binary planet is all very fuzzy at the edges.”
